A note on copyright laws.
Sep. 24th, 2010 12:36 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
In the US, anything published before 1923--no matter where in the world it was published--is in the public domain. As I understand it, that date doesn't move forward until 2019. I'm not sure why. Beyond the basics, this gets really confusing (if you understand it, I'd love an explanation).
Many countries have much simpler rules. In Australia, it's Life + 70 years, unless the author died before 1955, in which case a book is definitely in the public domain. This means that there are a lot of texts on Project Gutenberg Australia that aren't available on the U.S.-based Project Gutenberg, but depending on where you are, it may not be legal for you to use them.
There are also a lot of countries that have a simple Life + 50 or Life + 70 policy. Other countries, like, say, France, are much more complicated. Wikipedia has a handy list that will help you figure out what is in the public domain where you are.
Many countries have much simpler rules. In Australia, it's Life + 70 years, unless the author died before 1955, in which case a book is definitely in the public domain. This means that there are a lot of texts on Project Gutenberg Australia that aren't available on the U.S.-based Project Gutenberg, but depending on where you are, it may not be legal for you to use them.
There are also a lot of countries that have a simple Life + 50 or Life + 70 policy. Other countries, like, say, France, are much more complicated. Wikipedia has a handy list that will help you figure out what is in the public domain where you are.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 07:54 pm (UTC)But seriously, I really wish they would come up with some sort of 'exception rule' for these cases, rather than spoiling it for everyone else. There is absolutely no legitimate reason why *every* title published in, say, 1924 should fall under these restrictions.
Not to mention, it is my understanding that the name "Mickey Mouse" and the associated symbols (the round head with two ears, etc) *can* be trademarked, even if they are out of copyright. So the company will still have ways to protect itself from imitators.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-24 09:40 pm (UTC)That's...well, obviously that's ridiculous and unfair. The public domain in the US already stops before it does in most other countries. At some point it's going to have to move forward.
I'm also frustrated because I'm in the middle of several series that straddle the copyright line, and I can't read the later books unless I manage to track down paper copies, which is difficult.